Cambridge Journals Online - Display Related Articles

Home
CJO Mobile
Mobile Device Twinning
Contact Us
Site Map
Help
FAQ
Accessibility
Register

Basket
Log in

User Log-in
Institutional Log-in
Register for an Account

Username or Email Address:

Password:

Remember me

Forgot your Password? Log in

Trouble Logging in?

You can also login through:

Facebook
Twitter
Google Plus

About Us
News
Browse Journals
Authors
- Authors Home
Societies
- Societies Home
Librarians
Agents
- Agents Home
Users
- Users Home
Corporate
- Corporate Home

Citation Search
Quick Search

Advanced Search

Welcome to Cambridge Journals Online

To access subscriptions and personalised features please log in or register

Register for an Account

Journal Information

Editorial Board
Book Review Info
Instructions for Contributors
Transfer of Copyright Form
Abstracting & Indexing Services
Advertising Information
Impact Factor

Behavioral and Brain Sciences Home

Save Journal to My CJO Account

Browse Journal

Latest Issue
Back Issues

Browse Articles

Most Downloaded
Most Cited

Submit Your Article
Sign-Up for Contents Alerts

Subscribe & Recommend Journal

Subscribe to Journal

Article Submission
BBS Family Page
Rights & Permissions

Advertising and Corporate Sales

CJO Search Widget What is this?
Add Cambridge Journals Online as a search option in your browser toolbar. What is this?

Access Information

Consortia Access
Free Access
Individual Access
Open Access
Pay-per-View Access
Subscription Access

Home
>
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
>
Vol. 34 Issue 05
>
What is evaluative normativity, that we (maybe) should avoid it? - Related Articles

Original Article

What is evaluative normativity, that we (maybe) should avoid it?

Jonathan M. Weinberg

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Volume 34, Issue 05, October 2011, pp 274 -275

doi:10.1017/S0140525X11000604 (About DOI), Available on CJO 14 October 2011

Abstract
Add to Basket £30.00 / $45.00
Related Articles

Related Articles

Select All
Deselect All

Save to My Saved Articles
Export Citation (s)
Download PDF (s)
Add to Basket

Subtracting “ought” from “is”: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking Subtracting “ought” from “is”: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking

false

Abstract
Article Structure
Figures and Tables
References

Shira Elqayam and Jonathan St. B. T. Evans

Behavioral and Brain Sciences / Volume / Issue 05 / October 2011, pp 233 - 248

Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1100001X (About DOI), Published online: 14 October 2011

Post a Comment

Name *

Your Position and Institution

Email *

Would you like to receive email updates for comments posted on this article?

Comment * ???en_US.toc.displayArticle.1000 ??? characters remaining

Abstract
Buy This Article $45.00 / £30.00
Rent This Article Now for 24 Hours
$5.99 / £3.99 / €4.49
Related Articles

Select All
Deselect All

Save to My Saved Articles
Export Citation (s)
Download PDF (s)
Add to Basket

Copyright Statement
Rights and Permissions
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Feedback
Press Releases

© Cambridge University Press

Cambridge University Press

Cross Ref
Cited by CrossRef
Project Counter
Level Double-A conformance icon, W3C-WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
RSS Feed
Get Adobe Reader
Automated Content Access Protocol enabled