| Journal of Child Language (1999), 26:23-47 Cambridge University Press Copyright © 1999 Cambridge University Press Research Article Why is colour naming difficult? fn1NICK BRAISBY a1 c1 and JULIE DOCKRELL a2 a1 Department of Psychology, London Guildhall University a2 Division of Psychology, South Bank University Abstract A suggestion exists in the child language literature that the meanings of natural kind terms are acquired before the meanings of colour terms. Explanations have typically claimed that object terms are more salient than property terms. Such explanations, however, tend to ignore the fact that natural kind terms refer to categories with sharp, clear boundaries while colour terms refer to categories with unclear or variable boundaries. Nonetheless, there has been little evidence to show that the delay in the acquisition of colour terms arises from these semantic properties. This study compares natural kind and colour naming (and corresponding comprehension) by 48 children, ranging in age from 3;0 to 5;5. The results suggest that, contra the salience view, the apparent delay in colour naming may be explained on solely semantic grounds. (Received May 30 1995)(Revised May 18 1998) Correspondence: c1 Address for correspondence: Nick Braisby, Department of Psychology, London Guildhall University, Calcutta House, Old Castle Street, London E1 7NT, UK. tel: +44 171 320 1086; fax: +44 171 320 1236; e-mail: braisby@lgu.ac.uk. fn1 The order of authorship is alphabetical. We are grateful to Robin Campbell, Edward Chan, John Clibbens, Robin Cooper, Bradley Franks, James Hampton, Helen Moss, Philip Smith and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and discussions; and to Jonathan Patrizio for help with data entry. Nick Braisby also acknowledges the British Academy under the partial support of whose postdoctoral research fellowship this research was conducted. |